[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151110145505.GB5408@ubuntu>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 20:25:05 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/5] PM / OPP: Add
{opp-microvolt|opp-microamp|turbo-mode|opp-suspend}-<name> binding
On 06-11-15, 07:23, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Yeah, but in that case 1200 *may* not be a turbo frequency anymore, as
> the voltage constraints might have changed.
>
> So turbo frequency is something that should be used only in small
> bursts, as they are consume lot of power. They aren't available to be
> used freely. They may also have thermal side effects..
>
> In a similar way, for suspend-freq, we may or may not want the lowest
> frequency to be used during suspend and so that can change as well.
> And we shouldn't have suspend-freq set for two OPP nodes.
@Rob: Does my comments make any sense now? Or you still think we are
doing something wrong here?
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists