[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x49d1vhlp34.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:51:59 -0500
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To: Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@....com>
Cc: ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com, rjw@...ysocki.net, lenb@...nel.org,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] nvdimm: Add wrapper for IOCTL pass thru.
Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@....com> writes:
> Add IOCTL type 'P' to denote NVDIMM_TYPE_PASSTHRU.
Can't you just make passthrough a separate command? If you actually add
the ioctl definition for passthrough (which you didn't do for some
reason?), it looks odd:
#define ND_IOCTL_PASSTHRU _IOWR(NVDIMM_TYPE_PASSTHRU,, ND_CMD_PASSTHRU, \
struct ndn_package)
Care to comment on why you chose a different type instead of specifying
a new command?
> +struct ndn_pkg {
> + struct {
> + __u8 dsm_uuid[16];
> + __u32 dsm_in; /* size of _DSM input */
> + __u32 dsm_out; /* size of user buffer */
> + __u32 dsm_rev; /* revision of dsm call */
> + __u32 res[8]; /* reserved must be zero */
> + __u32 dsm_size; /* size _DSM would write */
> + } h;
> + unsigned char buf[];
Please change that to:
__u8 *buf;
since acpi_object.buffer.pointer is a u8 *.
Note that the size of this structure will be different for 32 vs. 64
bit, but I don't think it matters since offsets won't change (the
pointer is at the end of the structure).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists