[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1447188569.2701.91.camel@perches.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:49:29 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
linux-geode@...ts.infradead.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] video: constify geode ops structures
On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 12:34 -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> We can't make everything work just by static
> analyzers and checkpatch.pl runs (meaning the "backstop" comment
> above).
>
> Additionally, having the plugin infrastructure gets us the ability to
> do things that aren't presently possible (see the thread on the
> initify plugin, which can't be done in source alone).
#define __do_const __attribute__((do_const))
...
#ifndef __do_const
#define __do_const
#endif
I think it's always better for the reader to know that a
const struct declaration is used over a non-const struct
when the compiler, via plug-in extension, could convert
the declaration to const.
Is there a warning/info message produced by gcc and the
plug-in when a non-const declaration is converted to
const because of this attribute?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists