[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1447194427.31884.100.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 09:27:07 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Sebastian Ott <sebott@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Linux Virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] virtio core DMA API conversion
On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 10:54 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> Does that work on powerpc on existing kernels?
>
> Anyway, here's another crazy idea: make the quirk assume that the
> IOMMU is bypasses if and only if the weak barriers bit is set on
> systems that are missing the new DT binding.
"New DT bindings" doesn't mean much ... how do we change DT bindings on
existing machines with a FW in flash ?
What about partition <-> partition virtio such as what we could do on
PAPR systems. That would have the weak barrier bit.
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists