lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87611ak44x.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date:	Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:27:34 +1030
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] module: clean up RO/NX handling.

Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 02:53:57PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
>> @@ -1858,74 +1849,75 @@ static void mod_sysfs_teardown(struct module *mod)
>>  /*
>>   * LKM RO/NX protection: protect module's text/ro-data
>>   * from modification and any data from execution.
>> + *
>> + * General layout of module is:
>> + *          [text] [read-only-data] [writable data]
>> + * text_size -----^                ^               ^
>> + * ro_size ------------------------|               |
>> + * size -------------------------------------------|
>> + *
>> + * These values are always page-aligned (as is base)
>>   */
>> -void set_page_attributes(void *start, void *end, int (*set)(unsigned long start, int num_pages))
>> +static void frob_text(const struct module_layout *layout,
>> +		      int (*set_memory)(unsigned long start, int num_pages))
>>  {
>> -	unsigned long begin_pfn = PFN_DOWN((unsigned long)start);
>> -	unsigned long end_pfn = PFN_DOWN((unsigned long)end);
>> -
>> -	if (end_pfn > begin_pfn)
>> -		set(begin_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, end_pfn - begin_pfn);
>> +	BUG_ON((unsigned long)layout->base & (PAGE_SIZE-1));
>> +	BUG_ON((unsigned long)layout->text_size & (PAGE_SIZE-1));
>> +	set_memory((unsigned long)layout->base,
>> +		   layout->text_size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>
> Should the set_memory() call be skipped if text_size is 0?

Not AFAICT.  And in practice:
1) Every module on my system has a .text section.
2) Every module has a rodata section (.modinfo)
3) Every module on my system has a .data section.

So I think it would be a premature optimization.

Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ