lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:26:32 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	byungchul.park@....com
Cc:	mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, efault@....de,
	tglx@...utronix.de, yuyang.du@...el.com, pjt@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: prevent getting too much vruntime

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 05:50:27PM +0900, byungchul.park@....com wrote:

I've not actually read anything; my brain isn't working right today.

> +static inline void vruntime_unnormalize(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
> +{
> +	se->vruntime += cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
> +	if (unlikely((s64)se->vruntime < 0))
> +		se->vruntime = 0;
> +}

But this is broken. This simply _cannot_ be right.

vruntime very much needs to wrap in u64 space. While regular time in ns
takes some 584 year to wrap, vruntime is scaled. The fastest vruntime is
2/1024 or 512 times faster than normal time. Making it take just over a
year to wrap around. This will happen.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ