[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 12:01:34 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86, ras: Extend machine check recovery code to
annotated ring0 areas
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 02:11:35PM -0800, Luck, Tony wrote:
> That would be tidier ... the inside of the "if" has been gradually growing
> with added recovery paths. I had to fold the mce_panic() line to shut
> checkpatch up.
Bah, I don't take checkpatch seriously anymore. In that case, you
could've left the line stick out, for all I know. Our monitors can do
more pixels since the 1980s I believe. :)
> But I'm not really sure what tolerant==3 people really want here. By skipping
> the recovery code they doom themselves to hitting the machine check again.
Looks like a loop to me, fun.
I guess the user application should be aware of BUS_MCEERR_AR and
not attempt the same access to not cause a loop with tolerant==3.
Alternatively, we can still kill it to prevent the looping...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists