[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1511112120020.9296@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 21:46:23 -0800 (PST)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] tools/vm/page-types: suppress gcc warnings
On Thu, 12 Nov 2015, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > This can't possibly be correct, the warnings are legitimate and the result
> > of the sigsetjmp() in the function. You may be interested in
> > returns_twice rather than marking random automatic variables as volatile.
>
> Hm, ok. I saw no probs with `int first' and `end' being volatile
>
This will only happen with the undocumented change in your first patch
which adds -O2.
I don't know what version of gcc you're using, but only "first" and "end"
being marked volatile isn't sufficient since mere code inspection would
show that "off" will also be clobbered -- it's part of the loop.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists