linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] X.509: Fix the time validation [ver #2]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1447324684.44410.67.camel@intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:38:05 +0000
From:	"Woodhouse, David" <david.woodhouse@...el.com>
To:	"jmorris@...ei.org" <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	"dhowells@...hat.com" <dhowells@...hat.com>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org" 
	<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
	"keyrings@...r.kernel.org" <keyrings@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] X.509: Fix the time validation [ver #2]

On Thu, 2015-11-12 at 09:36 +0000, David Howells wrote:
> If it works, it emit a key ID; if it fails, it should give a bad
> message error.

In this sentence, failure is good, yes? This is a malformed key so we
*expect* the failure?

-- 
David Woodhouse                            Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@...el.com                              Intel Corporation


Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (3437 bytes)