[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56448128.1090600@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:08:08 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya_b1@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10 V2] KVM: x86: MMU: Clean up x86's mmu code for
future work
On 12/11/2015 12:48, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> v1->v2:
> Patch 5 and 7 are added based on Paolo's suggestions.
> Patch 8-10 are new.
>
> Patch 1/2/3/4: no change.
> Patch 5: Needed a bit more work than I had expected.
> Patch 6: Removed extra comment of v1 (patch 5 made it inappropriate).
> Patch 7: As expected, many places needed to be converted.
> Patch 8: This is new, but only a small change.
>
> Patch 9: Kind of an RFC (though I have checked it to some extent).
> Following two places need to be carefully checked:
> - in kvm_mmu_get_page: "if (!direct)" block after kvm_mmu_alloc_page()
> - in FNAME(fetch): "if (FNAME(gpte_changed)(vcpu, gw, it.level - 1))" case
> Patch 10: Trivial cleanup, assuming that patch 9 is correct.
>
>
> In summary: patch 1-7 is the result of updating v1 based on the suggestions.
> Although patch 5 does not look so nice than expected, this is the most
> conservative approach, and patch 8-10 try to alleviate the sadness.
If it works, it's actually better than what we have now. I'll review it
in a few days.
Marcelo, can you look at this as well? You are still king of MMU. :)
Thanks,
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists