[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151112121613.GC3838@pd.tnic>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:16:13 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Jörg Rödel <joro@...tes.org>,
kvm ML <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Shut up unhandled MSR warnings
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 11:59:58AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 11:33:33AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Yes, see guest_cpuid_has_* for an example of reading the CPUID values.
> >
> > But if it's defined for _all_ models starting at family 21, we can just
> > do it unconditionally.
>
> The thing is, those bits are Reserved again on the next family 22. Lemme
> take a look at guest_cpuid_has_* and see how ugly it gets.
Ok, I see there's guest_cpuid_is_amd() but I'd need also family and model.
How about adding also
guest_cpuid_family(), guest_cpuid_model(), guest_cpuid_stepping()? Those
could be quite useful in other contexts maybe.
Or, I can do a single function which simply returns CPUID_1_EAX of the
guest vcpu and caller can then pick stuff apart...
Thoughts?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists