lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <564496E8.60106@nvidia.com>
Date:	Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:40:56 +0000
From:	Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	LABBE Corentin <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
CC:	<gnurou@...il.com>, <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
	<swarren@...dotorg.org>, <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
	<linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: tegra: fix a possible NULL dereference


On 12/11/15 12:29, Thierry Reding wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
> 
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 08:26:03AM +0100, LABBE Corentin wrote:
>> of_match_device could return NULL, and so cause a NULL pointer
> 
> No. There is no way that of_match_device() can ever fail. The driver
> core uses the same table to match the OF device to the driver, so the
> only case where of_match_device() would return NULL is if no match was
> found, in which case the tegra_i2c_probe() function would never have
> been called in the first place.

Right and so ...

>> dereference later at line 809:
>> i2c_dev->hw = match->data;
>>
>> Signed-off-by: LABBE Corentin <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c | 3 +++
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
>> index a0522fc..c803551 100644
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
>> @@ -806,7 +806,10 @@ static int tegra_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  
>>  	if (pdev->dev.of_node) {

Can we get rid of this if-statement?

Jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ