[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151112180203.GF17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 19:02:03 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, mingo@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
corbet@....net, mhocko@...nel.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, will.deacon@....com,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] locking: Introduce smp_cond_acquire()
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 07:38:07PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> It seems that PPC needs to define smp_mb__before_spinlock() as full mb(),
> no?
It does:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/barrier.h:#define smp_mb__before_spinlock() smp_mb()
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists