[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151112182657.GA19785@dtor-ws>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:26:57 -0800
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] PM / wakeirq: check that wake IRQ is valid before accepting
it
Check that IRQ number passed to dev_pm_set_wake_irq and
dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq is valid (not negative) before accepting it.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
---
My recent change to i2c core introduced a code path that led to calling
dev_pm_set_wake_irq(&client->dev, -ENOENT), which succeeded but
obviously did the wrong thing. Checking the IRQ and bailing out early
would have helped noticing this issue earlier.
drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c b/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c
index eb6e674..0d77cd6 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c
@@ -68,6 +68,9 @@ int dev_pm_set_wake_irq(struct device *dev, int irq)
struct wake_irq *wirq;
int err;
+ if (irq < 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
wirq = kzalloc(sizeof(*wirq), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!wirq)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -167,6 +170,9 @@ int dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(struct device *dev, int irq)
struct wake_irq *wirq;
int err;
+ if (irq < 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
wirq = kzalloc(sizeof(*wirq), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!wirq)
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.6.0.rc2.230.g3dd15c0
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists