[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56441678.6040504@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:02:56 +0530
From: Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>
To: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
CC: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] spi: introduce mmap read support for spi flash
devices
Hi Brian,
On 11/12/2015 12:54 AM, Brian Norris wrote:
> In addition to my other comments:
>
[...]
>> + int (*spi_mtd_mmap_read)(struct spi_device *spi,
>> + loff_t from, size_t len,
>> + size_t *retlen, u_char *buf,
>> + u8 read_opcode, u8 addr_width,
>> + u8 dummy_bytes);
>
> This is seeming to be a longer and longer list of arguments. I know MTD
> has a bad habit of long argument lists (which then cause a ton of
> unnecessary churn when things need changed in the API), but perhaps we
> can limit the damage to the SPI layer. Perhaps this deserves a struct to
> encapsulate all the flash read arguments? Like:
>
> struct spi_flash_read_message {
> loff_t from;
> size_t len;
> size_t *retlen;
> void *buf;
> u8 read_opcode;
> u8 addr_width;
> u8 dummy_bits;
> // additional fields to describe rx_nbits for opcode/addr/data
> };
>
> struct spi_master {
> ...
> int (*spi_flash_read)(struct spi_device *spi,
> struct spi_flash_message *msg);
> };
Yeah.. I think struct encapsulation helps, this can also be used to pass
sg lists for dma in future. I will rework the series with your
suggestion to include nbits for opcode/addr/data.
Also, will add validation logic (similar to __spi_validate()) to check
whether master supports dual/quad mode for opcode/addr/data. I am
planning to add this validation code to spi_flash_read_validate(in place
of spi_mmap_read_supported())
Thanks!
--
Regards
Vignesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists