[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3F128C9216C9B84BB6ED23EF16290AFB1857D86D@CRSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 10:47:52 +0000
From: "Wan, Kaike" <kaike.wan@...el.com>
To: Saurabh Sengar <saurabh.truth@...il.com>,
"Weiny, Ira" <ira.weiny@...el.com>
CC: "Hefty, Sean" <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
"hal.rosenstock@...il.com" <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
"dledford@...hat.com" <dledford@...hat.com>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] IB/sa: replace GFP_KERNEL with GFP_ATOMIC
I don't think so.
The following patch has rendered this patch unnecessary:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7526811/
Kaike
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-rdma-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:linux-rdma-
> owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Saurabh Sengar
> Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 2:42 AM
> To: Weiny, Ira; Wan, Kaike
> Cc: Hefty, Sean; hal.rosenstock@...il.com; dledford@...hat.com; linux-
> rdma@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/sa: replace GFP_KERNEL with GFP_ATOMIC
>
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 at 04:30:10 +0000, Weiny, Ira wrote:
> > Until we can remove the spinlock the current proposed patch should be
> > applied in the interim. Sorry for the noise before.
>
> > Reviewed-By: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
>
> Hi,
>
> is this patch expected to be applied ?
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the
> body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists