linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] thermal: Add Mediatek thermal controller support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:26:37 +0000
From:	Javi Merino <javi.merino@....com>
To:	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>, mark.rutland@....com,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
	linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...gutronix.de,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] thermal: Add Mediatek thermal controller support

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:09:12AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 08:27:47AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:26:30AM -0800, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:05:54PM +0000, Javi Merino wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 11:13:32AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > > 
> > > <cut>
> > > 
> > > > > +
> > > > > +/*
> > > > > + * The MT8173 thermal controller has four banks. Each bank can read up to
> > > > > + * four temperature sensors simultaneously. The MT8173 has a total of 5
> > > > > + * temperature sensors. We use each bank to measure a certain area of the
> > > > > + * SoC. Since TS2 is located centrally in the SoC it is influenced by multiple
> > > > > + * areas, hence is used in different banks.
> > > > > + */
> > > > > +static const struct mtk_thermal_bank_cfg bank_data[] = {
> > > > > +	{
> > > > > +		.num_sensors = 2,
> > > > > +		.sensors = { MT8173_TS2, MT8173_TS3 },
> > > > > +	}, {
> > > > > +		.num_sensors = 2,
> > > > > +		.sensors = { MT8173_TS2, MT8173_TS4 },
> > > > > +	}, {
> > > > > +		.num_sensors = 3,
> > > > > +		.sensors = { MT8173_TS1, MT8173_TS2, MT8173_TSABB },
> > > > > +	}, {
> > > > > +		.num_sensors = 1,
> > > > > +		.sensors = { MT8173_TS2 },
> > > > > +	},
> > > > > +};
> > > 
> > > Would it make sense to simply expose all sensors and let the
> > > configuration of their aggregation be done by DT?
> > 
> > This particular layout has been chosen because there's also the Smart
> > Voltage Scaler (SVS) in the SoC. The SVS uses the same banks for
> > measuring temperatures. I don't know the details yet, I just asked the
> > Mediatek guys.
> 
> Ok, the job of the SVS is to always pick the best voltage for a given
> CPU frequency based on the temperature of the CPU cluster. How I
> understand it the SVS engine automatically reads temperatures from bank0
> for the first CPU cluster and from bank1 for the second CPU cluster. For
> this to work we are not free to assign the sensors to the banks
> arbitrarily.
> 
> I was told that controlling the CPU frequency the performance is better
> if we use the maximum temperature of the whole die rather than the
> temperature of individual clusters.
> 
> I would prefer to keep the sensor/bank association like it currently is
> as it allows for easy SVS engine integration. Also I would prefer to
> expose a single thermal zone for now, it will be easier to add
> additional zones later than it is to remove them later once we have
> exposed them to the device tree.
> 
> Is that ok with you?

Fair enough.  I agree that it's easier to add thermal zones in the
future than to remove it.  Thanks for the explanation.

Cheers,
Javi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/