linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM64: use linux/types.h in kvm.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 13 Nov 2015 12:38:43 +0100
From:	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM64: use linux/types.h in kvm.h

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 03:41:08PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> We should always use linux/types.h instead of asm/types.h for
> consistency, and Kbuild actually warns about it:
> 
> ./usr/include/asm/kvm.h:35: include of <linux/types.h> is preferred over <asm/types.h>
> 
> This patch does as Kbuild asks us.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

I don't see this error when building the kernel, does it require a
special option to check for these things?


In any case, thanks for the patch, I have applied it.

-Christoffer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/