[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3713227.4t0cg6qNF9@wuerfel>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 13:42:09 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
Cc: daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] clocksource/drivers/dw_apb_timer: Use {readl|writel}_relaxed
On Friday 13 November 2015 20:31:23 Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/dw_apb_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/dw_apb_timer.c
> index c76c750..04282ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/dw_apb_timer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/dw_apb_timer.c
> @@ -51,13 +51,13 @@ clocksource_to_dw_apb_clocksource(struct clocksource *cs)
>
> static unsigned long apbt_readl(struct dw_apb_timer *timer, unsigned long offs)
> {
> - return readl(timer->base + offs);
> + return readl_relaxed(timer->base + offs);
> }
>
> static void apbt_writel(struct dw_apb_timer *timer, unsigned long val,
> unsigned long offs)
> {
> - writel(val, timer->base + offs);
> + writel_relaxed(val, timer->base + offs);
> }
>
>
As with the other patch, I think it would be nicer to only change the
functions that benefit from the change, to make it easier to prove
that the conversion is correct. You could introduce apbt_readl_releaxed()
etc functions and call them from __apbt_read_clocksource()
and apbt_next_event().
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists