linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 13/17] arm64:ilp32: add sys_ilp32.c and a separate table (in entry.S) to use it

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3810107.ZiMyX4Iloo@wuerfel>
Date:	Fri, 13 Nov 2015 16:34:10 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>, pinskia@...il.com,
	Prasun.Kapoor@...iumnetworks.com, catalin.marinas@....com,
	Nathan_Lynch@...tor.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	agraf@...e.de, klimov.linux@...il.com,
	Andrew Pinski <Andrew.Pinski@...iumnetworks.com>,
	broonie@...nel.org, jan.dakinevich@...il.com,
	Andrew Pinski <apinski@...ium.com>, ddaney.cavm@...il.com,
	bamvor.zhangjian@...wei.com, philipp.tomsich@...obroma-systems.com,
	andrey.konovalov@...aro.org,
	christoph.muellner@...obroma-systems.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 13/17] arm64:ilp32: add sys_ilp32.c and a separate table (in entry.S) to use it

On Thursday 12 November 2015 14:47:18 Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> writes:
> 
> > On Thursday 12 November 2015 10:44:55 Andreas Schwab wrote:
> >> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> writes:
> >> 
> >> > What do you mean with 32-bit off_t?
> >> 
> >> An ABI with 32-bit off_t, ie. all currently implemented 32-bit ABIs.
> >> 
> >> > Do you mean that glibc emulates a 32-bit off_t on top of the 64-bit
> >> > __kernel_loff_t?
> >> 
> >> Glibc is bridging the user-space ABI to the kernel ABI.
> >
> > Ok, but why?
> 
> That's how the ABI is defined right now.  I didn't make that up.

Ok, I guess it will remain a mystery then.

Should we perhaps define __ARCH_WANT_SYSCALL_OFF_T for the unistd.h
file then, so we provide both the off_t and the loff_t based syscalls?

That would avoid the extra wrapper in glibc when using a 32-bit
off_t if that is the preferred mode for user space.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/