[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VfyOWrihHC4nhpKQrjH9SjP0NnaN1WU8se3PL4biWtz4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 03:10:13 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: use resource_size_t to store physical address
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> The dw_mmc driver stores the physical address of the MMIO registers
> in a pointer, which requires the use of type casts, and is actually
> broken if anyone ever has this device on a 32-bit SoC in registers
> above 4GB. Gcc warns about this possibility when the driver is built
> with ARM LPAE enabled:
> - host->phy_regs = (void *)(regs->start);
> + host->phy_regs = regs->start;
> /* Set external dma config: burst size, burst width */
> - cfg.dst_addr = (dma_addr_t)(host->phy_regs + fifo_offset);
> + cfg.dst_addr = host->phy_regs + fifo_offset;
dst_addr is dma_addr_t?
> /* Registers's physical base address */
> - void *phy_regs;
> + resource_size_t phy_regs;
If dst_addr is dma_addr_t wouldn't be a problem when
resource_size_t is defined as 64-bit address, and dma_addr_t as 32-bit?
Btw, for me casting to dma_addr_t looks sane.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists