lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56463567.7050801@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:09:27 -0800
From:	Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
To:	Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>,
	Laura Abbott <labbott@...oraproject.org>
Cc:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
	Zhong Jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/2] arm64: Allow changing of attributes outside of
 modules

On 11/13/2015 12:27 AM, Xishi Qiu wrote:
> On 2015/11/11 9:57, Laura Abbott wrote:
<snip>
>>   }
>>
>>   static int change_memory_common(unsigned long addr, int numpages,
>> @@ -43,7 +180,6 @@ static int change_memory_common(unsigned long addr, int numpages,
>>   	unsigned long size = PAGE_SIZE*numpages;
>>   	unsigned long end = start + size;
>>   	int ret;
>> -	struct page_change_data data;
>>
>>   	if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(addr)) {
>>   		start &= PAGE_MASK;
>> @@ -51,17 +187,15 @@ static int change_memory_common(unsigned long addr, int numpages,
>>   		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
>>   	}
>>
>> -	if (start < MODULES_VADDR || start >= MODULES_END)
>> +	if (start < PAGE_OFFSET && !is_vmalloc_addr((void *)start) &&
>> +		(start < MODULES_VADDR || start >= MODULES_END))
>
> How about abstracting "start < MODULES_VADDR || start >= MODULES_END" to a new function?
> e.g. is_module_addr(), however it is a little confusion with is_module_address().
>
>>   		return -EINVAL;
>>
>> -	if (end < MODULES_VADDR || end >= MODULES_END)
>> +	if (end < PAGE_OFFSET && !is_vmalloc_addr((void *)end) &&
>> +		(end < MODULES_VADDR || end >= MODULES_END))
>>   		return -EINVAL;
>>
>
> It will not filter this case, start in module range and end in vmalloc range, right?
> start and end should be both in one range.
>

The goal of this check was to prevent it from being used on userspace addresses. It's
very complicated and hard to understand. I'm going to give this some more thought about
a better way to do this check.

  
> Thanks,
> Xishi Qiu

Thanks,
Laura
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ