[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151113194031.GI8456@google.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:40:31 -0800
From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: spi: OF module autoloading is still broken (was: Re: m25p80: Commit
"allow arbitrary OF matching for "jedec,spi-nor"" breaks module autoloading)
(Changing subject line, because apparently some people ignore mail if it
doesn't have 'SPI' in the subject line)
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 10:59:26AM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> + others
>
> On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 11:54:16PM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> > Seems like commit 43163022927b6e7d202a7e6f939c3f392465494d
> > (allow arbitrary OF matching for "jedec,spi-nor") broke autoloading
> > of the m25p80 module.
> > MODALIAS is "spi:spi-nor" and removing "spi-nor" as device alias
> > prevents module autoloading.
> >
> > Of course we could revert the removal of the "spi-nor" device alias.
> > However it might be better to switch to DT-based matching for
> > DT-configured devices.
> >
> > Adding a call to of_device_uevent_modalias to spi_uevent in spi.c
> > solved the issue for me, drawback however is that just the first
> > "compatible" value is used as modalias. In case of m25p80 this means
> > that "jedec,spi-nor" has to be the first "compatible" value.
> > This constraint might be too strict ..
> >
> > Having said that I'm not sure what could be a better way to fix
> > the issue than just re-introducing the "spi-nor" device alias.
>
> Is this [1] getting fixed in SPI any time soon? Looks like there was
> some progress [2], but AFAICT it's not completed.
>
> I'd just like to know what the way forward here should be for m25p80.
> Really, "jedec,spi-nor" never autoloaded modules very reliably because
> of the SPI core constaints. So I'm not sure I'd consider this a
> regression, and I might be OK waiting around if it'll be fixed in a
> reasonable time frame.
>
> FWIW, I can do testing if somebody's tackling this still. Just CC me.
>
> Regards,
> Brian
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/11/458
> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/8/20/109
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists