[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1511131509180.3987@nanos>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 15:11:16 -0500 (EST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
cc: Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik@...vell.com>,
Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>,
Lior Amsalem <alior@...vell.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fix regression introduced by set_irq_flags()
removal
Thomas,
On Wed, 11 Nov 2015, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Have you had the time to consider the proposed solution? For 4.3 we
> implemented the quick work-around that consisted in clearing
> IRQ_NOAUTOEN, but it's probably not a very good long-term solution.
>
> Don't hesitate to let me know if you'd like to see some modifications
> to the proposed approach, or if you have a totally different approach
> in mind.
I'm not sure if we really need all that muck if we can just rely on
that flag. I don't see the extra value, but you might have something
in mind which does not jump into my face right now.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists