[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1447451390-16480-21-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 13:48:34 -0800
From: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc: Dirk Mueller <dmueller@...e.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.13.y-ckt 20/96] Use WARN_ON_ONCE for missing X86_FEATURE_NRIPS
3.13.11-ckt30 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: =?UTF-8?q?Dirk=20M=C3=BCller?= <dmueller@...e.com>
commit d2922422c48df93f3edff7d872ee4f3191fefb08 upstream.
The cpu feature flags are not ever going to change, so warning
everytime can cause a lot of kernel log spam
(in our case more than 10GB/hour).
The warning seems to only occur when nested virtualization is
enabled, so it's probably triggered by a KVM bug. This is a
sensible and safe change anyway, and the KVM bug fix might not
be suitable for stable releases anyway.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Mueller <dmueller@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index 9bf2696..fa8296f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ static void skip_emulated_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
if (svm->vmcb->control.next_rip != 0) {
- WARN_ON(!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NRIPS));
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NRIPS));
svm->next_rip = svm->vmcb->control.next_rip;
}
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists