[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5647A77E.6040501@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 22:28:30 +0100
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Arvid Brodin <arvid.brodin@...en.se>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: [PATCH] net-hsr: Delete unnecessary checks before the function call
"kfree_skb"
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 22:23:48 +0100
The kfree_skb() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
returns immediately. Thus the test around the calls is not needed.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
net/hsr/hsr_forward.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/hsr/hsr_forward.c b/net/hsr/hsr_forward.c
index 7871ed6..55ba943 100644
--- a/net/hsr/hsr_forward.c
+++ b/net/hsr/hsr_forward.c
@@ -355,11 +355,8 @@ void hsr_forward_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, struct hsr_port *port)
goto out_drop;
hsr_register_frame_in(frame.node_src, port, frame.sequence_nr);
hsr_forward_do(&frame);
-
- if (frame.skb_hsr != NULL)
- kfree_skb(frame.skb_hsr);
- if (frame.skb_std != NULL)
- kfree_skb(frame.skb_std);
+ kfree_skb(frame.skb_hsr);
+ kfree_skb(frame.skb_std);
return;
out_drop:
--
2.6.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists