[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABg9mcvomep=M1As_Vj=XuTNk=jiGwXQqQWbjotMXP2csKX=Bg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 18:39:33 -0800
From: Z Lim <zlim.lnx@...il.com>
To: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...aro.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] arm64: bpf: make BPF prologue and epilogue align
with ARM64 AAPCS
Yang, I noticed another thing...
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Yang Shi <yang.shi@...aro.org> wrote:
> Save and restore FP/LR in BPF prog prologue and epilogue, save SP to FP
> in prologue in order to get the correct stack backtrace.
>
> However, ARM64 JIT used FP (x29) as eBPF fp register, FP is subjected to
> change during function call so it may cause the BPF prog stack base address
> change too.
>
> Use x25 to replace FP as BPF stack base register (fp). Since x25 is callee
> saved register, so it will keep intact during function call.
Can you please add save/restore for x25 also? :)
> It is initialized in BPF prog prologue when BPF prog is started to run
> everytime. When BPF prog exits, it could be just tossed.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists