[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151114070815.GD3685@sudip-pc>
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 12:38:15 +0530
From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To: Anjali Menon <cse.anjalimenon@...il.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: most: aim-cdev: Used "==" instead of assignment
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 09:57:10AM +0530, Anjali Menon wrote:
> Used double equal sign instead of equal to sign in the if condition
> to remove the error detected by checkpatch.pl.
>
> ERROR: do not use assignment in if condition
>
> Signed-off-by: Anjali Menon <cse.anjalimenon@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/staging/drivers/staging/most/aim-cdev/cdev.c | 2 +-
something wrong with your tree. This path doesnot exist.
But in any case, i think the patch is wrong. wait_event_interruptible()
is executed when most_get_mbo() returns NULL. so if you do
mbo == most_get_mbo() it will immediately come out of sleep as the
condition is true. I think here the intention was to sleep as long as
most_get_mbo() returns NULL. And when it returns a valid pointer it is
saved in mbo variable so that it can be used later in copy_from_user().
regards
sudip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists