[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5646FEC7.5050600@metafoo.de>
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 10:28:39 +0100
From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To: Nizam Haider <nizamhaider786@...il.com>
CC: knaack.h@....de, jic23@...nel.org, pmeerw@...erw.net,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nizam Haider <nijamh@...c.in>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: iio: iio_simple_dummy_buffer: Typo in comments
area
On 11/14/2015 03:44 AM, Nizam Haider wrote:
> Fix simple typo in comments
>
> Signed-off-by: Nizam Haider <nijamh@...c.in>
Thanks for the patch.
> ---
> drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c b/drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c
> index cf44a6f..c8f889b 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c
> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static irqreturn_t iio_simple_dummy_trigger_h(int irq, void *p)
> * software scans: can be considered to be random access
> * so efficient reading is just a case of minimal bus
> * transactions.
> - * software culled hardware scans:
> + * software called hardware scans:
I don't think that's a typo. The non-patched version makes a lot more sense
then the patched vesion.
> * occasionally a driver may process the nearest hardware
> * scan to avoid storing elements that are not desired. This
> * is the fiddliest option by far.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists