[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5647076B.3080709@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 11:05:31 +0100
From: Anton Bondarenko <anton.bondarenko.sama@...il.com>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Cc: broonie@...nel.org, b38343@...escale.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
vladimir_zapolskiy@...tor.com, jiada_wang@...tor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] spi: imx: return error from dma channel request
On 05.11.2015 17:00, Anton Bondarenko wrote:
> On 05.11.2015 09:56, Sascha Hauer wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 03:41:40PM +0100, Anton Bondarenko wrote:
>>> From: Anton Bondarenko <anton_bondarenko@...tor.com>
>>>
>>> On SDMA initialization return exactly the same error, which is
>>> reported by dma_request_slave_channel_reason(), it is a preceding
>>> change to defer SPI DMA initialization, if SDMA module is not yet
>>> available.
>>
>> Maybe something like: "fix probe deferral when dmaengine is not yet
>> available" in the subject line will better express that this is a patch
>> that should be applied ASAP. Also you can move this up to the front of
>> the series when resending.
>>
>> Sascha
>>
>
> This patch itself does not implement deferral for spi-imx if dmaengine
> not ready. The patch targets 2 things: give a bit more detailed error
> information of SPI dma slave channel initialization error and provide a
> basis for the next patch ([PATCH v3 7/7] spi: imx: defer spi
> initialization, if DMA engine is pending).
>
> Regards, Anton
Does anyone has other comments regarding this commit?
Regards, Anton
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists