[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20151115.125905.63907005203700143.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 12:59:05 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: andy.shevchenko@...il.com
Cc: linux@...nbow-software.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
romieu@...zoreil.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dl2k: Add support for IP1000A-based cards
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 04:30:25 +0200
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 12:05 AM, Ondrej Zary
>> @@ -433,9 +474,10 @@ rio_open (struct net_device *dev)
>>
>> alloc_list (dev);
>>
>> - /* Get station address */
>> - for (i = 0; i < 6; i++)
>> - dw8(StationAddr0 + i, dev->dev_addr[i]);
>> + /* Set station address */
>> + for (i = 0; i < 3; i++)
>> + dw16(StationAddr0 + 2 * i,
>> + cpu_to_le16(((u16 *)dev->dev_addr)[i]));
>
> Is it specific requirement for new HW? If not, may be another patch
> with micro optimizations.
I absolutely agree, this definitely should not just be blindly copied
over from the other driver.
And if it is a requirement:
1) It must be documented as per why, both in a comment above the loop
and in the commit log message.
2) It must therefore be tested on dl2k chips that worked with the
dl2k driver beforehand to prove that it doesn't break them.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists