| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1447675815-166222-13-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 12:10:14 +0000
From: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
To: <acme@...nel.org>, <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
<ast@...nel.org>
CC: <lizefan@...wei.com>, <pi3orama@....com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 12/13] perf test: Test BPF prologue
This patch introduces a new BPF script to test BPF prologue. The new
script probes at null_lseek, which is the function pointer when we try
to lseek on '/dev/null'.
null_lseek is chosen because it is a function pointer, so we don't need
to consider inlining and LTO.
By extracting file->f_mode, bpf-script-test-prologue.c should know whether
the file is writable or readonly. According to llseek_loop() and
bpf-script-test-prologue.c, one forth of total lseeks should be collected.
Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>
Cc: pi3orama@....com
---
tools/perf/tests/Build | 9 +++++++-
tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-test-prologue.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tools/perf/tests/bpf.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tools/perf/tests/llvm.c | 4 ++++
tools/perf/tests/llvm.h | 2 ++
5 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-test-prologue.c
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/Build b/tools/perf/tests/Build
index f41ebf8..0ff8a97 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/Build
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/Build
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ perf-y += sample-parsing.o
perf-y += parse-no-sample-id-all.o
perf-y += kmod-path.o
perf-y += thread-map.o
-perf-y += llvm.o llvm-src-base.o llvm-src-kbuild.o
+perf-y += llvm.o llvm-src-base.o llvm-src-kbuild.o llvm-src-prologue.o
perf-y += bpf.o
perf-y += topology.o
@@ -49,6 +49,13 @@ $(OUTPUT)tests/llvm-src-kbuild.c: tests/bpf-script-test-kbuild.c
$(Q)sed -e 's/"/\\"/g' -e 's/\(.*\)/"\1\\n"/g' $< >> $@
$(Q)echo ';' >> $@
+$(OUTPUT)tests/llvm-src-prologue.c: tests/bpf-script-test-prologue.c
+ $(call rule_mkdir)
+ $(Q)echo '#include <tests/llvm.h>' > $@
+ $(Q)echo 'const char test_llvm__bpf_test_prologue_prog[] =' >> $@
+ $(Q)sed -e 's/"/\\"/g' -e 's/\(.*\)/"\1\\n"/g' $< >> $@
+ $(Q)echo ';' >> $@
+
ifeq ($(ARCH),$(filter $(ARCH),x86 arm arm64))
perf-$(CONFIG_DWARF_UNWIND) += dwarf-unwind.o
endif
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-test-prologue.c b/tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-test-prologue.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7230e62
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-test-prologue.c
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+/*
+ * bpf-script-test-prologue.c
+ * Test BPF prologue
+ */
+#ifndef LINUX_VERSION_CODE
+# error Need LINUX_VERSION_CODE
+# error Example: for 4.2 kernel, put 'clang-opt="-DLINUX_VERSION_CODE=0x40200" into llvm section of ~/.perfconfig'
+#endif
+#define SEC(NAME) __attribute__((section(NAME), used))
+
+#include <uapi/linux/fs.h>
+
+#define FMODE_READ 0x1
+#define FMODE_WRITE 0x2
+
+static void (*bpf_trace_printk)(const char *fmt, int fmt_size, ...) =
+ (void *) 6;
+
+SEC("func=null_lseek file->f_mode offset orig")
+int bpf_func__null_lseek(void *ctx, int err, unsigned long f_mode,
+ unsigned long offset, unsigned long orig)
+{
+ if (err)
+ return 0;
+ if (f_mode & FMODE_WRITE)
+ return 0;
+ if (offset & 1)
+ return 0;
+ if (orig == SEEK_CUR)
+ return 0;
+ return 1;
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+int _version SEC("version") = LINUX_VERSION_CODE;
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c b/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
index ec16f78..c7131fa 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
@@ -19,6 +19,29 @@ static int epoll_pwait_loop(void)
return 0;
}
+#ifdef HAVE_BPF_PROLOGUE
+
+static int llseek_loop(void)
+{
+ int fds[2], i;
+
+ fds[0] = open("/dev/null", O_RDONLY);
+ fds[1] = open("/dev/null", O_RDWR);
+
+ if (fds[0] < 0 || fds[1] < 0)
+ return -1;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < NR_ITERS; i++) {
+ lseek(fds[i % 2], i, (i / 2) % 2 ? SEEK_CUR : SEEK_SET);
+ lseek(fds[(i + 1) % 2], i, (i / 2) % 2 ? SEEK_CUR : SEEK_SET);
+ }
+ close(fds[0]);
+ close(fds[1]);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+#endif
+
static struct {
enum test_llvm__testcase prog_id;
const char *desc;
@@ -37,6 +60,17 @@ static struct {
&epoll_pwait_loop,
(NR_ITERS + 1) / 2,
},
+#ifdef HAVE_BPF_PROLOGUE
+ {
+ LLVM_TESTCASE_BPF_PROLOGUE,
+ "Test BPF prologue generation",
+ "[bpf_prologue_test]",
+ "fix kbuild first",
+ "check your vmlinux setting?",
+ &llseek_loop,
+ (NR_ITERS + 1) / 4,
+ },
+#endif
};
static int do_test(struct bpf_object *obj, int (*func)(void),
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/llvm.c b/tools/perf/tests/llvm.c
index bc4cf50..7f4f7f7 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/llvm.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/llvm.c
@@ -44,6 +44,10 @@ static struct {
.source = test_llvm__bpf_test_kbuild_prog,
.desc = "Test kbuild searching",
},
+ [LLVM_TESTCASE_BPF_PROLOGUE] = {
+ .source = test_llvm__bpf_test_prologue_prog,
+ .desc = "Test BPF prologue generation",
+ },
};
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/llvm.h b/tools/perf/tests/llvm.h
index d91d8f4..5150b4d 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/llvm.h
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/llvm.h
@@ -6,10 +6,12 @@
extern const char test_llvm__bpf_base_prog[];
extern const char test_llvm__bpf_test_kbuild_prog[];
+extern const char test_llvm__bpf_test_prologue_prog[];
enum test_llvm__testcase {
LLVM_TESTCASE_BASE,
LLVM_TESTCASE_KBUILD,
+ LLVM_TESTCASE_BPF_PROLOGUE,
__LLVM_TESTCASE_MAX,
};
--
1.8.3.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists