linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Improve drm_of_component

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2290660.pLIRHdxPYF@diego>
Date:	Mon, 16 Nov 2015 17:07:17 +0100
From:	Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To:	Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>
Cc:	Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
	Mark Yao <mark.yao@...k-chips.com>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>,
	linux-rockchip <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
	LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Improve drm_of_component_probe() and move rockchip to use it

Hi Liviu,

Am Montag, 16. November 2015, 14:44:51 schrieb Liviu Dudau:
> When I have introduced the drm_of_component_probe() function I have managed
> to break rockchip's DRM driver as the compare_of() function had to match
> both local crtc ports and remote encoder ones. As suggested by Russell
> King, I have now enhanced the drm_of_component_probe() function to take two
> comparison functions, and converted (again) rockchip driver to use it.
> 
> I would really like to get some Tested-By this time if possible from IMX,
> Armada and Rockchip developers as I lack hardware to do that myself.
> 
> The only thing not implemented from Russell's suggestion list is the
> renaming of the function into drm_kms_component_probe().

 with these patches applied I loose the display on my rk3288. A bit of dumb
debug-output shows that the compare function does seem to do strange things:

[    1.020476] [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810
[    1.025943] drm_of_component_probe: adding port /vop@...40000/port
[    1.032225] drm_of_component_probe: adding port /vop@...30000/port
[    1.038421] drm_of_component_probe: adding encoder /hdmi@...80000
[    1.044535] drm_of_component_probe: adding encoder /edp@...70000
[    1.050562] drm_of_component_probe: adding encoder /hdmi@...80000
[    1.056663] drm_of_component_probe: adding encoder /edp@...70000

---- Columns:	dev->parent / dev	comparing	dev->parent->of_node	with	np

[    1.062683] compare_port: platform/ff980000.hdmi comparing NULL with /vop@...40000/port
[    1.071017] compare_port: platform/ff980000.hdmi comparing NULL with /vop@...40000/port
[    1.079024] compare_port: platform/ff930000.vop comparing NULL with /vop@...40000/port
[    1.087117] compare_port: platform/ff980000.hdmi comparing NULL with /vop@...40000/port
[    1.095130] compare_port: platform/ff930000.vop comparing NULL with /vop@...40000/port
[    1.103054] compare_port: platform/ff940000.vop comparing NULL with /vop@...40000/port
[    1.111553] panel_regulator: supplied by vcc33_sys


I need to dig deeper to find out what's happening there, but maybe you
already have some idea in the meantime :-)


Thanks
Heiko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/