[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y4dxltzi.fsf@saruman.tx.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 11:44:17 -0600
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
John Youn <John.Youn@...opsys.com>
CC: Yunzhi Li <lyz@...k-chips.com>,
Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
<linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>,
<gregory.herrero@...el.com>, <yousaf.kaukab@...el.com>,
<dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
<johnyoun@...opsys.com>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] usb: dwc2: host: Fix missing device insertions
Hi,
(replying here for the context of why I think this is NOT the smallest
patch possible for the -rc)
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> writes:
> If you've got your interrupt signals bouncing a bit as you insert your
> USB device, you might end up in a state when the device is connected but
> the driver doesn't know it.
>
> Specifically, the observed order is:
> 1. hardware sees connect
> 2. hardware sees disconnect
> 3. hardware sees connect
> 4. dwc2_port_intr() - clears connect interrupt
> 5. dwc2_handle_common_intr() - calls dwc2_hcd_disconnect()
>
> Now you'll be stuck with the cable plugged in and no further interrupts
> coming in but the driver will think we're disconnected.
>
> We'll fix this by checking for the missing connect interrupt and
> re-connecting after the disconnect is posted. We don't skip the
> disconnect because if there is a transitory disconnect we really want to
> de-enumerate and re-enumerate.
>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Don't reconnect when called from _dwc2_hcd_stop() (John Youn)
>
> drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h | 6 ++++--
> drivers/usb/dwc2/core_intr.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/usb/dwc2/hcd.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/usb/dwc2/hcd_intr.c | 6 +-----
> 4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h b/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h
> index a66d3cb62b65..daa1c342cdac 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h
> @@ -1154,12 +1154,14 @@ static inline int dwc2_hsotg_set_test_mode(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg,
>
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_USB_DWC2_HOST) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_USB_DWC2_DUAL_ROLE)
> extern int dwc2_hcd_get_frame_number(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg);
> -extern void dwc2_hcd_disconnect(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg);
> +extern void dwc2_hcd_connect(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg);
> +extern void dwc2_hcd_disconnect(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg, bool force);
this 'force' parameter is new and looks unnecessary for the -rc.
> extern void dwc2_hcd_start(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg);
> #else
> static inline int dwc2_hcd_get_frame_number(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg)
> { return 0; }
> -static inline void dwc2_hcd_disconnect(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg) {}
> +static inline void dwc2_hcd_connect(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg) {}
> +static inline void dwc2_hcd_disconnect(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg, bool force) {}
> static inline void dwc2_hcd_start(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg) {}
> static inline void dwc2_hcd_remove(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg) {}
> static inline int dwc2_hcd_init(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg, int irq)
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc2/core_intr.c b/drivers/usb/dwc2/core_intr.c
> index 27daa42788b1..61601d16e233 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc2/core_intr.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc2/core_intr.c
> @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ static void dwc2_handle_otg_intr(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg)
> dev_dbg(hsotg->dev, "a_suspend->a_peripheral (%d)\n",
> hsotg->op_state);
> spin_unlock(&hsotg->lock);
> - dwc2_hcd_disconnect(hsotg);
> + dwc2_hcd_disconnect(hsotg, false);
because force is unnecessary (it seems to be just an optimization to
me), this change is unnecessary.
> spin_lock(&hsotg->lock);
> hsotg->op_state = OTG_STATE_A_PERIPHERAL;
> } else {
> @@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ static void dwc2_handle_disconnect_intr(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg)
> dwc2_op_state_str(hsotg));
>
> if (hsotg->op_state == OTG_STATE_A_HOST)
> - dwc2_hcd_disconnect(hsotg);
> + dwc2_hcd_disconnect(hsotg, false);
and so is this.
> dwc2_writel(GINTSTS_DISCONNINT, hsotg->regs + GINTSTS);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc2/hcd.c b/drivers/usb/dwc2/hcd.c
> index e79baf73c234..e208eac7ff57 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc2/hcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc2/hcd.c
> @@ -268,15 +268,33 @@ static void dwc2_hcd_cleanup_channels(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg)
> }
>
> /**
> + * dwc2_hcd_connect() - Handles connect of the HCD
> + *
> + * @hsotg: Pointer to struct dwc2_hsotg
> + *
> + * Must be called with interrupt disabled and spinlock held
> + */
> +void dwc2_hcd_connect(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg)
> +{
> + if (hsotg->lx_state != DWC2_L0)
> + usb_hcd_resume_root_hub(hsotg->priv);
> +
> + hsotg->flags.b.port_connect_status_change = 1;
> + hsotg->flags.b.port_connect_status = 1;
> +}
you make no mention of why this is needed. This is basically a refactor,
not a fix.
> +/**
> * dwc2_hcd_disconnect() - Handles disconnect of the HCD
> *
> * @hsotg: Pointer to struct dwc2_hsotg
> + * @force: If true, we won't try to reconnect even if we see device connected.
> *
> * Must be called with interrupt disabled and spinlock held
> */
> -void dwc2_hcd_disconnect(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg)
> +void dwc2_hcd_disconnect(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg, bool force)
as mentioned before, unnecessary 'force' parameter.
> @@ -315,6 +333,24 @@ void dwc2_hcd_disconnect(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg)
> dwc2_hcd_cleanup_channels(hsotg);
>
> dwc2_host_disconnect(hsotg);
> +
> + /*
> + * Add an extra check here to see if we're actually connected but
> + * we don't have a detection interrupt pending. This can happen if:
> + * 1. hardware sees connect
> + * 2. hardware sees disconnect
> + * 3. hardware sees connect
> + * 4. dwc2_port_intr() - clears connect interrupt
> + * 5. dwc2_handle_common_intr() - calls here
> + *
> + * Without the extra check here we will end calling disconnect
> + * and won't get any future interrupts to handle the connect.
> + */
> + if (!force) {
> + hprt0 = dwc2_readl(hsotg->regs + HPRT0);
> + if (!(hprt0 & HPRT0_CONNDET) && (hprt0 & HPRT0_CONNSTS))
> + dwc2_hcd_connect(hsotg);
what's inside this 'force' branch is what you really need to fix the
problem, right ? It seems like for the -rc cycle, all you need is:
diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc2/hcd.c b/drivers/usb/dwc2/hcd.c
index 571c21727ff9..967d1e686efe 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/dwc2/hcd.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/dwc2/hcd.c
@@ -276,6 +276,7 @@ static void dwc2_hcd_cleanup_channels(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg)
*/
void dwc2_hcd_disconnect(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg)
{
+ u32 hprt0;
u32 intr;
/* Set status flags for the hub driver */
@@ -315,6 +316,15 @@ void dwc2_hcd_disconnect(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg)
dwc2_hcd_cleanup_channels(hsotg);
dwc2_host_disconnect(hsotg);
+
+ hprt0 = dwc2_readl(hsotg->regs + HPRT0);
+ if (!(hprt0 & (HPRT0_CONNDET | HPRT0_CONNSTS))) {
+ if (hsotg->lx_state != DWC2_L0)
+ usb_hcd_resume_roothub(hsotg->priv);
+
+ hsotg->flags.b.port_connect_status_change = 1;
+ hsotg->flags.b.port_connect_status = 1;
+ }
}
/**
This has some code duplication and it'll *always* check for CONNDET |
CONNSTS, but that's okay for the -rc. Follow-up patches (for v4.5 merge
window) can refactor the code duplication and introduce 'force'
parameter.
> @@ -2365,7 +2401,7 @@ static void _dwc2_hcd_stop(struct usb_hcd *hcd)
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&hsotg->lock, flags);
> /* Ensure hcd is disconnected */
> - dwc2_hcd_disconnect(hsotg);
> + dwc2_hcd_disconnect(hsotg, true);
unnecessary change.
> dwc2_hcd_stop(hsotg);
> hsotg->lx_state = DWC2_L3;
> hcd->state = HC_STATE_HALT;
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc2/hcd_intr.c b/drivers/usb/dwc2/hcd_intr.c
> index bda0b21b850f..03504ac2fecc 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc2/hcd_intr.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc2/hcd_intr.c
> @@ -350,11 +350,7 @@ static void dwc2_port_intr(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg)
> dev_vdbg(hsotg->dev,
> "--Port Interrupt HPRT0=0x%08x Port Connect Detected--\n",
> hprt0);
> - if (hsotg->lx_state != DWC2_L0)
> - usb_hcd_resume_root_hub(hsotg->priv);
> -
> - hsotg->flags.b.port_connect_status_change = 1;
> - hsotg->flags.b.port_connect_status = 1;
> + dwc2_hcd_connect(hsotg);
unnecessary change.
Do you agree or do you think 'force' is really necessary for this fix ?
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (819 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists