[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151116175112.GH31303@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 17:51:12 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: spi: OF module autoloading is still broken
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 02:26:49PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On 11/16/2015 10:53 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > What I don't really understand here is why we've decided to push all
> > this stuff into the subsystems, it seems like if we're managing to do
> > the matching based on the compatible we really ought to be able to have
> > the core figure out the uevents for us too. I need to go have a look at
> > that...
> There is already a set of generic OF uevents that are reported by the core
> but IIUC those are not used by udev. Please take a look to of_device_uevent()
> in drivers/of/device.c and dev_uevent() that calls it in drivers/base/core.c.
I know what the current situation is, my point is that I don't
understand why we would choose to do that ("What I don't really
understand here...").
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists