[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <564A19B7.7000802@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 15:00:23 -0300
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: spi: OF module autoloading is still broken
Hello Mark,
On 11/16/2015 02:51 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 02:26:49PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> On 11/16/2015 10:53 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>> What I don't really understand here is why we've decided to push all
>>> this stuff into the subsystems, it seems like if we're managing to do
>>> the matching based on the compatible we really ought to be able to have
>>> the core figure out the uevents for us too. I need to go have a look at
>>> that...
>
>> There is already a set of generic OF uevents that are reported by the core
>> but IIUC those are not used by udev. Please take a look to of_device_uevent()
>> in drivers/of/device.c and dev_uevent() that calls it in drivers/base/core.c.
>
> I know what the current situation is, my point is that I don't
> understand why we would choose to do that ("What I don't really
> understand here...").
>
Got it, sorry for misunderstanding you. I also don't know the answer FWIW.
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists