[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrVaFshy7V5e34J=+83sAthMNpphL8LRXxqFX7zKB-Zetg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 10:52:52 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@...ux.intel.com>,
Mihai Donțu <mdontu@...defender.com>,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm/vmx: EPTP switching test
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:18 AM,
=?UTF-8?q?Radim=20Kr=C4=8Dm=C3=A1=C5=99?= <rkrcmar@...hat.com> wrote:
> 2015-11-16 19:59+0200, Michael S. Tsirkin:
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 06:51:06PM +0100, =?UTF-8?q?Radim=20Kr=C4=8Dm=C3=A1=C5=99?= wrote:
>>> 2015-11-15 18:00+0200, Michael S. Tsirkin:
>>> (And I think that eptp switching is expected to be used in conjuction
>>> with #VE, so it'd then make sense to implement a nop for it as well.)
>>
>> No idea how would I even test it, so I'm not interested in #VE at this
>> point. If you are - go ahead and post a patch for that on top though,
>> why not.
>
> I thought that it's going to be simpler to provide functionality (that
> utilizes eptp switching) to the guest through #VE, which probably isn't
> true as I think more about it. (Not interested in implementing it :])
I'm willing to review a #VE stub. I'm not likely to implement it.
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists