[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151116191007.GL18894@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 14:10:07 -0500
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Milos Vyletel <milos@...hat.com>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] stop_machine: cleanup the usage of preemption
counter in cpu_stopper_thread()
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 08:33:32PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> 1. Change this code to use preempt_count_inc/preempt_count_dec; this way
> it works even if CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=n, and we avoid the unnecessary
> __preempt_schedule() check (stop_sched_class is not preemptible).
>
> And this makes clear that we only want to make preempt_count() != 0
> for __might_sleep() / schedule_debug().
>
> 2. Change WARN_ONCE() to use %pf to print the function name and remove
> kallsyms_lookup/ksym_buf.
>
> 3. Move "int ret" into the "if (work)" block, this looks more consistent.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
The entire series looks good to me. Please feel free to add
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists