[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHmME9oQuiHfZmW-c0VN9ivQLjC0nPuuprv7-ryS+AqFvAfXMg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 20:33:42 +0100
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, tgraf@...g.ch,
Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>,
Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ip_tunnel: disable preemption when updating per-cpu tstats
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:17 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> So another fix could have been to do local_bh_disable() in the
> udp_tunnel6_xmit_skb() helper.
This would have fixed one problem, but everywhere
udp_tunnel_xmit_skb() (4, not 6) is called, iptunnel_xmit_stats is
called right after it, so there would have to be a modicum of patches
for all of these places too.
By the way, there's something else I noticed about this in dealing
with these functions: the return value of udp_tunnel_xmit_skb is
different from that of udp_tunnel6_xmit_skb. Nobody is using them
incorrectly, so far as I can see, but it is confusing that they return
different things. I had started to clean this up and send a patch, but
it got a bit invasive in drivers I shouldn't really touch. But if
somebody with a bit more top-down command of things wants to poke at
this, it's a low hanging fruit as far as I can see.
>
> Thanks again.
My pleasure.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists