[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <564A41AF.4040208@nod.at>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 21:50:55 +0100
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ABI/API" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
LXC development mailing-list
<lxc-devel@...ts.linuxcontainers.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
cgroups mailinglist <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: CGroup Namespaces (v4)
Am 16.11.2015 um 21:46 schrieb Serge E. Hallyn:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 09:41:15PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Serge,
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:51 PM, <serge@...lyn.com> wrote:
>>> To summarize the semantics:
>>>
>>> 1. CLONE_NEWCGROUP re-uses 0x02000000, which was previously CLONE_STOPPED
>>>
>>> 2. unsharing a cgroup namespace makes all your current cgroups your new
>>> cgroup root.
>>>
>>> 3. /proc/pid/cgroup always shows cgroup paths relative to the reader's
>>> cgroup namespce root. A task outside of your cgroup looks like
>>>
>>> 8:memory:/../../..
>>>
>>> 4. when a task mounts a cgroupfs, the cgroup which shows up as root depends
>>> on the mounting task's cgroup namespace.
>>>
>>> 5. setns to a cgroup namespace switches your cgroup namespace but not
>>> your cgroups.
>>>
>>> With this, using github.com/hallyn/lxc #2015-11-09/cgns (and
>>> github.com/hallyn/lxcfs #2015-11-10/cgns) we can start a container in a full
>>> proper cgroup namespace, avoiding either cgmanager or lxcfs cgroup bind mounts.
>>>
>>> This is completely backward compatible and will be completely invisible
>>> to any existing cgroup users (except for those running inside a cgroup
>>> namespace and looking at /proc/pid/cgroup of tasks outside their
>>> namespace.)
>>> cgroupns-root.
>>
>> IIRC one downside of this series was that only the new "sane" cgroup
>> layout was supported
>> and hence it was useless for everything which expected the default layout.
>> Hence, still no systemd for us. :)
>>
>> Is this now different?
>
> Yes, all hierachies are no supported.
>
Should read "now"? :-)
If so, *awesome*!
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists