lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151116213423.GA23525@roeck-us.net>
Date:	Mon, 16 Nov 2015 13:34:23 -0800
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] PCI: pciehp: Merge hotplug work requests

Hi folks,

any comments on this series ?

Thanks,
Guenter

On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 07:48:15PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Some oddball devices may experience a PCIe link flap after power-on.
> This may result in the following sequence of events.
> 
> fpc0 kernel: pciehp 0000:02:08.0:pcie24: Card present on Slot(0)
> fpc0 kernel: pciehp 0000:02:08.0:pcie24: slot(0): Link Up event
> fpc0 kernel: pciehp 0000:02:08.0:pcie24:
> 	Link Up event ignored on slot(0): already powering on
> fpc0 kernel: pciehp 0000:02:08.0:pcie24: slot(0): Link Down event
> fpc0 kernel: pciehp 0000:02:08.0:pcie24:
> 	Link Down event queued on slot(0): currently getting powered on
> fpc0 kernel: pciehp 0000:02:08.0:pcie24: slot(0): Link Up event
> fpc0 kernel: pciehp 0000:02:08.0:pcie24:
> 	Link Up event queued on slot(0): currently getting powered off
> 
> This causes the driver for affected devices to be instantiated, removed,
> and re-instantiated.
> 
> An even worse problem is a device which resets itself continuously.
> This can result in the following endless sequence of messages.
> 
> pciehp 0000:02:0a.0:pcie24: Card present on Slot(10)
> pciehp 0000:02:0a.0:pcie24: Card not present on Slot(10)
> pciehp 0000:02:0a.0:pcie24: Card present on Slot(10)
> pciehp 0000:02:0a.0:pcie24: Card not present on Slot(10)
> pciehp 0000:02:0a.0:pcie24: Card present on Slot(10)
> pciehp 0000:02:0a.0:pcie24: Card not present on Slot(10)
> 
> The problem in the both cases is that all events are enqueued as hotplug
> work requests and executed in sequence, which can overwhelm the system
> and even result in "hung task" tracebacks in pciehp_power_thread().
> 
> This exposes an underlying limitation of the hotplug state machine: It
> executes all received requests, even though only the most recent request
> really needs to be handled. As a result, by the time a request is handled,
> it may well be obsolete and have been superseded by many other enable /
> disable requests which have been enqueued in the meantime.
> 
> To solve the problem, fold hotplug work requests into a single request.
> Store the request as well as the work data structure in 'struct slot',
> thus eliminating the need to allocate memory for each request.
> Handle a sequence of requests by setting a 'disable' flag when needed,
> indicating that a link needs to be disabled prior to re-enabling it.
> 
> With this change, requests and request sequences are handled as follows.
> 
> enable (single request):		enable link
> disable (single request):		disable link
> ... disable-enable-disable...disable:	disable link
> ... disable-enable-disable...enable:	disable link, then enable it
> 
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> ---
> This is a different approach to solve the problem I tried to address
> earlier with with "PCI: pciehp: Add support for delayed power-on" [1].
> 
> While the earlier patch implemented an additional state in the hotplug
> state machine to solve the problem, the approach taken here is a bit
> simpler and more straightfoward. By folding multiple requests into one,
> the follow-up patch can use delayed work to implement power-on delays.
> An additional advantage is that this patch can be applied separately
> to simplify the state machine.
> 
> While working on this patch, I also tried to drop multiple "disable"
> requests, and only disable a slot if it was already disabled, to reduce
> overhead. Unfortunately, this did not always work. In some instances,
> I ended up in a situation where a device could not be enabled
> because the system thought that it already existed. I don't know
> if this is a weakness in this patch or some state change I did not catch. 
> This may be left for further study.
> 
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/12/686
> 
>  drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp.h      |  4 +++
>  drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_ctrl.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c  |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp.h b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp.h
> index 62d6fe6c3714..364b6fa32978 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp.h
> @@ -78,6 +78,9 @@ struct slot {
>  	struct mutex lock;
>  	struct mutex hotplug_lock;
>  	struct workqueue_struct *wq;
> +	struct work_struct hotplug_work;
> +	u32 hotplug_req;
> +	bool disable;			/* true to disable before enable */
>  };
>  
>  struct event_info {
> @@ -130,6 +133,7 @@ void pciehp_queue_interrupt_event(struct slot *slot, u32 event_type);
>  int pciehp_configure_device(struct slot *p_slot);
>  int pciehp_unconfigure_device(struct slot *p_slot);
>  void pciehp_queue_pushbutton_work(struct work_struct *work);
> +void pciehp_power_thread(struct work_struct *work);
>  struct controller *pcie_init(struct pcie_device *dev);
>  int pcie_init_notification(struct controller *ctrl);
>  int pciehp_enable_slot(struct slot *p_slot);
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_ctrl.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_ctrl.c
> index 880978b6d534..ad1321e91546 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_ctrl.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_ctrl.c
> @@ -156,13 +156,9 @@ static int remove_board(struct slot *p_slot)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -struct power_work_info {
> -	struct slot *p_slot;
> -	struct work_struct work;
> -	unsigned int req;
> -#define DISABLE_REQ 0
> -#define ENABLE_REQ  1
> -};
> +/* Hotplug work requests */
> +#define DISABLE_REQ	0
> +#define ENABLE_REQ	1
>  
>  /**
>   * pciehp_power_thread - handle pushbutton events
> @@ -171,14 +167,19 @@ struct power_work_info {
>   * Scheduled procedure to handle blocking stuff for the pushbuttons.
>   * Handles all pending events and exits.
>   */
> -static void pciehp_power_thread(struct work_struct *work)
> +void pciehp_power_thread(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
> -	struct power_work_info *info =
> -		container_of(work, struct power_work_info, work);
> -	struct slot *p_slot = info->p_slot;
> -	int ret;
> +	struct slot *p_slot = container_of(work, struct slot, hotplug_work);
> +	int ret, req;
> +	bool disable;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&p_slot->lock);
> +	req = p_slot->hotplug_req;
> +	disable = p_slot->disable;
> +	p_slot->disable = false;
> +	mutex_unlock(&p_slot->lock);
>  
> -	switch (info->req) {
> +	switch (req) {
>  	case DISABLE_REQ:
>  		mutex_lock(&p_slot->hotplug_lock);
>  		pciehp_disable_slot(p_slot);
> @@ -189,6 +190,8 @@ static void pciehp_power_thread(struct work_struct *work)
>  		break;
>  	case ENABLE_REQ:
>  		mutex_lock(&p_slot->hotplug_lock);
> +		if (disable)
> +			pciehp_disable_slot(p_slot);
>  		ret = pciehp_enable_slot(p_slot);
>  		mutex_unlock(&p_slot->hotplug_lock);
>  		if (ret)
> @@ -200,26 +203,19 @@ static void pciehp_power_thread(struct work_struct *work)
>  	default:
>  		break;
>  	}
> -
> -	kfree(info);
>  }
>  
>  static void pciehp_queue_power_work(struct slot *p_slot, int req)
>  {
> -	struct power_work_info *info;
> -
> -	p_slot->state = (req == ENABLE_REQ) ? POWERON_STATE : POWEROFF_STATE;
> -
> -	info = kmalloc(sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!info) {
> -		ctrl_err(p_slot->ctrl, "no memory to queue %s request\n",
> -			 (req == ENABLE_REQ) ? "poweron" : "poweroff");
> -		return;
> +	if (req == ENABLE_REQ) {
> +		p_slot->state = POWERON_STATE;
> +	} else {
> +		p_slot->state = POWEROFF_STATE;
> +		p_slot->disable = true;
>  	}
> -	info->p_slot = p_slot;
> -	INIT_WORK(&info->work, pciehp_power_thread);
> -	info->req = req;
> -	queue_work(p_slot->wq, &info->work);
> +	p_slot->hotplug_req = req;
> +
> +	queue_work(p_slot->wq, &p_slot->hotplug_work);
>  }
>  
>  void pciehp_queue_pushbutton_work(struct work_struct *work)
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
> index 5c24e938042f..e4e6fcbe1e20 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
> @@ -755,6 +755,7 @@ static int pcie_init_slot(struct controller *ctrl)
>  	mutex_init(&slot->lock);
>  	mutex_init(&slot->hotplug_lock);
>  	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&slot->work, pciehp_queue_pushbutton_work);
> +	INIT_WORK(&slot->hotplug_work, pciehp_power_thread);
>  	ctrl->slot = slot;
>  	return 0;
>  abort:
> -- 
> 2.1.4
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ