[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <564A4EB2.6050401@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 16:46:26 -0500
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence before allocating
descs for legacy IRQs
On 11/16/2015 04:39 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2015, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> Xen expects legacy interrupts to be there (pretty much for the same reason as
>> Hyper-V does) and with this change arch_probe_nr_irqs() returns zero and no
>> descriptors are allocated.
> Right, because everything which has a PIT gets them and everything
> which does not have a PIT does not.
>
>> We can allocate those descriptors as needed in xen_irq_init() (if we know that
>> IRQs are legacy), although that would look somewhat ugly and out of place.
> Why preallocating them in xen_irq_init()? You simply can remove the
> NR_IRQS_LEGACY checks in xen_allocate_irq_gsi/xen_free_irq(), right?
Of course. Thanks.
-boris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists