[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1447714667.83864.212.camel@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 22:57:47 +0000
From: "Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>
To: "dmaengine@...r.kernel.org" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
"okaya@...eaurora.org" <okaya@...eaurora.org>
CC: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] User space to kernel space copy optimization
On Mon, 2015-11-16 at 21:53 +0000, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> One of the things I'm interested in is to use a memcpy capable DMA
> engine HW to optimize user space and kernel space parameter copying.
Have you looked at why NET_DMA was deprecated and using DMA engine to
do kernel->user copy could be a problem?
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/
?id=77873803363c
>
> Of course, this will not be viable for all parameter sizes but I can
> see
> this being useful. The goal is to save power in the cost of little
> performance.
>
> Before I go and invent my own mechanism, I'd like to have ideas on
> what
> an acceptable solution would look like. Especially, I'm looking for a
> generic implementation that could plug into any DMA engine HW.
>
> --
> Sinan Kaya
> Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center,
> Inc.
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a
> Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine"
> in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists