[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151117213126.GH22864@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 16:31:26 -0500
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: pablo@...filter.org, kaber@...sh.net, kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu,
lizefan@...wei.com, hannes@...xchg.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...com, daniel@...earbox.net,
daniel.wagner@...-carit.de, nhorman@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] sock, cgroup: add sock->sk_cgroup
Hello, David.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 04:25:54PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> > In preparation, this patch adds sock->sk_cgroup which points to the
> > associated cgroup. A sock is associated on creation and stays
> > associated to the same cgroup until freed; unfortunately, this ends up
> > adding another cgroup field to struct sock on top of sk_cgrp_prioidx
> > and sk_classid. I tried to think of a way to somehow overload the
> > existing fields but couldn't come up with a reasonable one.
>
> sk->sk_cgrp_prioidx is simply sk->sk_cgroup->id, is it not?
Unfortunately, sk->sk_cgrp_prioidx is an arbitrary value which can be
configured through "net_cls.classid". :(
> We really need to consolidate this before we stuff even more members
> into the socket for control group support, sorry.
Yeah, it is messy. I'll see if I can come up with a non-crazy way to
combine the other two fields with ->sk_cgroup.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists