| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 17:21:27 -0500 From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> Cc: davem@...emloft.net, pablo@...filter.org, kaber@...sh.net, kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu, lizefan@...wei.com, hannes@...xchg.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com, daniel.wagner@...-carit.de, nhorman@...driver.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] sock, cgroup: add sock->sk_cgroup Hello, Daniel. On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:46:30PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > Do you see a way forward where the new behavior could be enabled f.e. > as an extra mount option (that long-term would be made default, while > deprecating the current behavior) on net_cls et al? There are various > more users at least on the net_cls side (nft and tc as well). Would be > really great, if sk_cgroup could abstract that somehow away for all of > them w/o adding a second version to all users. I'm not really sure I'm following what you mean but no matter how we go about it net_cls and prio won't be broken. I likely will end up making the two sets mutually exclusive once configured run-time but there's no reason to use both at the same time anyway. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists