[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151117222127.GJ22864@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 17:21:27 -0500
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, pablo@...filter.org, kaber@...sh.net,
kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu, lizefan@...wei.com, hannes@...xchg.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
coreteam@...filter.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com,
daniel.wagner@...-carit.de, nhorman@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] sock, cgroup: add sock->sk_cgroup
Hello, Daniel.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:46:30PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> Do you see a way forward where the new behavior could be enabled f.e.
> as an extra mount option (that long-term would be made default, while
> deprecating the current behavior) on net_cls et al? There are various
> more users at least on the net_cls side (nft and tc as well). Would be
> really great, if sk_cgroup could abstract that somehow away for all of
> them w/o adding a second version to all users.
I'm not really sure I'm following what you mean but no matter how we
go about it net_cls and prio won't be broken. I likely will end up
making the two sets mutually exclusive once configured run-time but
there's no reason to use both at the same time anyway.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists