[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1511171107390.3761@nanos>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 11:08:19 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH -v2.1] x86: Kill notsc
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:11:03AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > There is an interesting problem:
> >
> > tsc_init()
> > {
> > tsc_khz = x86_platform.calibrate_tsc();
> > if (!tsc_khz) {
> > mark_tsc_unstable("could not calculate TSC khz");
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > In the current code we do NOT use TSC for sched_clock() and that's
> > correct as we have no idea what the TSC frequency is.
> >
> > With your changes that is not longer the case, so you end up with a
> > completely wreckaged sched clock.
>
> Hmm, I see it.
>
> Well, I had a related splat which bombed because cyc2ns_init() had to
> run before we do sched_init()->idle_init() which called sched_clock()
> and there we did the cycles_2_ns() thing and the percpu vars weren't
> initialized yet.
>
> That's why I did this:
>
> +void __init early_tsc_init(void)
> +{
> + int cpu;
> +
> + /*
> + * We need to init the cycles to ns conversion machinery because
> + * init_idle() below will call sched_clock() which needs it.
> + */
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> + cyc2ns_init(cpu);
> +}
>
> Maybe I should move tsc_init() before sched_init() so that the
> calibration happens before we use the TSC in sched_clock() for the first
> time...?
How does that help if your TSC frequency is 0 after the calibration?
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists