linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] usb: chipidea: removing of_find

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <yw1xy4dwhmu7.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 Nov 2015 11:44:32 +0000
From:	Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com>
To:	Saurabh Sengar <saurabh.truth@...il.com>
Cc:	Peter.Chen@...escale.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: chipidea: removing of_find_property

Saurabh Sengar <saurabh.truth@...il.com> writes:

> call to of_find_property() before of_property_read_u32() is unnecessary.
> of_property_read_u32() anyway calls to of_find_property() only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Saurabh Sengar <saurabh.truth@...il.com>
> ---
> v2: removed pval variable
>  drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c b/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c
> index 965d0e2..916a20d 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c
> @@ -688,52 +688,43 @@ static int ci_get_platdata(struct device *dev,
>  	if (usb_get_maximum_speed(dev) == USB_SPEED_FULL)
>  		platdata->flags |= CI_HDRC_FORCE_FULLSPEED;
>
> -	if (of_find_property(dev->of_node, "phy-clkgate-delay-us", NULL))
> -		of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "phy-clkgate-delay-us",
> -				     &platdata->phy_clkgate_delay_us);
> +	if (!of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "phy-clkgate-delay-us",
> +				     &platdata->phy_clkgate_delay_us))
>
>  	platdata->itc_setting = 1;

Drop that if().  Since we're ignoring of_property_read_u32() failing,
there is no need to test its return value, and code above incorrectly
makes the next statement conditional.

-- 
Måns Rullgård
mans@...sr.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/