linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] percpu: remove PERCPU_ENOUGH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <7ECE283C-7EC8-4E17-98C5-F4895F17A2DC@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 Nov 2015 21:25:10 +0900
From:	Jungseok Lee <jungseoklee85@...il.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	cl@...ux.com, tony.luck@...el.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] percpu: remove PERCPU_ENOUGH_ROOM which is stale definition

On Nov 17, 2015, at 12:55 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:

Dear Tejun,

> On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 01:26:07PM +0000, Jungseok Lee wrote:
>> As pure cleanup, this patch removes PERCPU_ENOUGH_ROOM which is not
>> used any more. That is, no code refers to the definition.
>> 
>> Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jungseok Lee <jungseoklee85@...il.com>
> 
> Applied to percpu/for-4.5.

I don't know how to handle this one as not getting feedbacks from ia64
side. Thanks for taking caring of this one!

Best Regards
Jungseok Lee
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/