linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 18/19] ARC: [plat-eznps] replace sync with proper cpu barrier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <564B1F74.6090709@synopsys.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 Nov 2015 18:07:08 +0530
From:	Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:	<gilf@...hip.com>, <talz@...hip.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <cmetcalf@...hip.com>,
	Noam Camus <noamc@...hip.com>,
	<linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 18/19] ARC: [plat-eznps] replace sync with proper cpu
 barrier

On Tuesday 17 November 2015 05:52 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> > BTW since we are on the topic we have this loop in stack unwinder which can
>> > potentially cause RCU stalls, actual lockups etc. I was planning to add the
>> > following - does that seem fine to you.
> Worries me more than anything. How could you get stuck in there?

No we not getting stuck in there - but this has potential to - if say unwind info
were corrupt (not seen that ever though).

The old code won't even respond to say a Ctrl+C if it were stuck !
Plus the reschedule there will keeps sched happy when say unraveling deep stack
frames with perf ?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/