[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151117013830.GV8456@google.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 17:38:30 -0800
From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] phy: brcmstb-sata: add missing of_node_put
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:33:14PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> for_each_available_child_of_node performs an of_node_get on each iteration,
> so a return from the middle of the loop requires an of_node_put.
>
> A simplified version of the semantic patch that finds this problem is as
> follows (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr):
>
> // <smpl>
> @@
> expression root,e;
> local idexpression child;
> @@
>
> for_each_available_child_of_node(root, child) {
> ... when != of_node_put(child)
> when != e = child
> (
> return child;
> |
> * return ...;
> )
> ...
> }
> // </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
>
> ---
For this patch:
Acked-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
> drivers/phy/phy-brcmstb-sata.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
[snip patch, which fixes of_node_put() handling for
for_each_available_child_of_node() loop, which creates PHY devices with
devm_phy_create()]
This reminds me of a potential problem I'm looking at in other
subsystems: from code reading (I haven't seen any issues in practice,
probably because I don't use OF_DYNAMIC) it looks like device-creating
infrastructure like the PHY subsystem should be acquiring a reference to
the device_node when they stash it away. But drivers/phy/phy-core.c does
not do this, AFAICT.
See phy_create(), which does
phy->dev.of_node = node ?: dev->of_node;
and later might reuse this of_node pointer, even though it never called
of_node_get() on this node.
Potential patch to fix this (not tested).
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
index fc48fac003a6..8df29caeeef9 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
@@ -697,6 +697,7 @@ struct phy *phy_create(struct device *dev, struct device_node *node,
phy->dev.class = phy_class;
phy->dev.parent = dev;
phy->dev.of_node = node ?: dev->of_node;
+ of_node_get(phy->dev.of_node);
phy->id = id;
phy->ops = ops;
@@ -726,6 +727,7 @@ struct phy *phy_create(struct device *dev, struct device_node *node,
return phy;
put_dev:
+ of_node_put(phy->dev.of_node);
put_device(&phy->dev); /* calls phy_release() which frees resources */
return ERR_PTR(ret);
@@ -775,6 +777,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_phy_create);
*/
void phy_destroy(struct phy *phy)
{
+ of_node_put(phy->dev.of_node);
pm_runtime_disable(&phy->dev);
device_unregister(&phy->dev);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists